Regarding message of 11th October 2016

I have attempted a possible theory to try and understand following paragraph given to us by our ET friends containing mathematical equations.

*“2×2+4 = 6, in an equation of mass far beyond your understanding, the algorithms needed to assess this sum are as follows: 2-4=6 tricky you think, but not if you understand that the four equals proportions that are equal to whole. An equation of binary code will also be a part which follows a sequence of numbers, 11 01 10 10 01 to (or 2) a mathematical equation of figures. Combine these numbers to form the answers are needed. Your minds will need focus.”*

The first sentence in the above paragraph appears to be only an example which I admit is an equation that I do not have the mathematical know-how to work out, however it does help with the second set of Binary numbers. By reading the previous paragraph in the message we get an idea of what the numbers may refer to, note in particular ** “We spoke of butterflies and change but you have to create a pathway of love and light to enable a focus”** .

*“Cover-up is apparently a common means to hide the truth of our existence. Creatures of the earth called man, are insignificant to our ways and our coming. Be prepared for an onslaught of such things your eyes have never seen. We will speak to those who have focus, allow us in. We will grant you peace and a life of happiness and the world will understand. We have hearts of gold that will assist your men of science in leaps and bounds. Have you not wondered why it is that your existence is but a short one? You are but children never asking of existence. We spoke of butterflies and change but you have to create a pathway of love and light to enable a focus. We are the Arcturians, we speak through this flesh being, his mind attempts to open up. He sees the light of love, the fragrance of roses will envelop his efforts.”*

This specific Binary code 1101101001 is called a ‘string sequence’ and can be used as a Genetic Algorithm to manipulate the chromosomes in a DNA sequence, to implement the survival of the fittest in a search to produce increasingly improved outcomes to reach the best solution. This solution, could it be man?

I also bring your attention to a sentence earlier in the same transcript:

*“For you must prepare yourselves to become a chrysalis to unify and bring that splendour to the fore.”*

For those of you like me who are not mathematicians, the simplest way to describe what an algorithm is, is to say that it is a set of steps to help solve an equation.

I leave my thoughts with you for comment, correction or further ideas.

**This is a postscript added on 2nd November 2016:**

Regarding maths in messages of 11th and 25th October

The original figures of 2 x 2 + 4 = 6 in the message of 11.10.16

*“2×2+4 = 6, in an equation of mass far beyond your understanding, the algorithms needed to assess this sum are as follows: 2-4=6 tricky you think, but not if you understand that the four equals proportions that are equal to whole. An equation of binary code will also be a part which follows a sequence of numbers, 11 01 10 10 01 to (or 2) a mathematical equation of figures. Combine these numbers to form the answers are needed. Your minds will need focus.”*

**THEN:**

Our ET friends came back to us in the message of 25th October 2016 and gave us this following paragraph, it seems they are trying to help us with the mathematics regarding the equation of mass far beyond my own understanding:

*“A fraction of an inch is given by many of your world as a measurer of time. We will also issue a measure of time in which we’ll articulate our minds to those of wisdom listening for the figures, the sums of arithmetic. Your mind will witness many things of a wondrous nature as you relinquish it, give us your thoughts. Four was a measure given as part of a whole, you have wondered what was the whole that this number was a part of, could it be a fraction or perhaps a percentage of 10 × 10.”*

We have done a little working out to try and clarify what they are getting at, however we know they are talking of algorithms into a far more complex theory. Below is what we can show.

The original equation: 2 x 2 + 4 = 6

The last sentence gives us more of a clue about the number 4

“Four was a measure given as part of a whole, you have wondered what was the whole that this number was a part of, could it be a fraction or perhaps a percentage of 10 × 10.”

Therefore: 2 x 2 + 4% = 6

Therefore 4% must equal 2

So 4% of the whole which equals 2 would mean that the whole number would be 50

Using algorithms this equation could be taken much further, but still beyond my ability!